We can work it out


Readers will notice a rather excited exchange in the Letters section this week, as some correspondents dissect what they saw as a misleading, if not outright ridiculous letter in last week’s issue. This is a sign of a healthy democracy, a community involved in its affairs, and eager to debate. But much more goes on behind the scenes than makes it to the printed page.

I think we all like to see argument and discussion based on strongly held opinions which in turn are based on facts and careful thought. What is less acceptable to many is the trend which has become all too familiar, that of people claiming the most outrageous conspiracy theories based on illogical and unproven “facts”. The difficult part of all of this is to find the right balance between allowing free debate on the one hand, and closing down dangerous misinformation on the other.

In the past week, I have had to tell one letter writer that a letter would not be published because it was so misleading and lacking in any rational argument that it endangered people’s health and even their lives. I think you will all understand that this was on the subject of vaccines and masks. But it went much further than simply objecting to either of those things; it made claims against individuals and made statements that were simply wrong.

Naturally, the writer of that letter accused me of being part of the cover-up, lined up with those who were trying to enslave the entire population of the world for our own wicked aims. Even publishing the letter last week that has inspired a few replies in this issue has brought criticism. There are those who believe that anything which might encourage the gullible to believe something untrue or one-sided should not be given the oxygen of publicity. Once again, it’s hard to find the right balance sometimes. Personally, I am getting truly fed up, tired and deeply irritated by the wild conspiracies that people are promulgating everywhere. I want to get throughto them somehow and ask why they think the overwhelming majority of medical professionals would take part in a giant lie designed to enslave the rest of the world. I would like them to explain why they choose to believe a handful of crackpots with their outlandish and illogical claims, rather than the statements of educated, informed, professional and caring people.

Just as last week’s letter writer claimed that the climate is in good shape, with fewer fires and storms than in the past, there are those who believe or claim to believe that there is a worldwide plot to gain control of people’s minds by injecting them with some kind of nanites. They actually use this term coming as it does straight from science fiction, as do so many of their conspiracy elements. Don’t they think for themselves? Do they really believe that only they and a few other enlightened ones around the globe really know what’s going on, and that the rest of us are being taken for a very dangerous ride by evil and malignant forces?

Really, I despair. Groups like Qanon, clearly unbalanced individuals like the MyPillow man, or any of Trump’s acolytes seem to thrive on the free publicity of social media platforms like Facebook or Twitter. I have made no secret of the fact that I dislike Facebook’s enabling of these unhinged theories, but what is the proper response? Do we in the media simply (to use a favourite word of the naysayers) cancel them by refusing to print anything we don’t think is valid? Does that not end up in a system of censorship?

No, as I say, there is a real need for balance here. We cannot, as a society, take the path of refusing to cater to opposite political or social ideas to our own. There must be free and open debate, or else we will fall into an even worse trap than the nuts think we already have. It is not a matter of one thing or the other, it is a gradation, a spectrum that runs from one view to its opposite, right and left, liberal and conservative, however you want to describe it.

But, at either end, there is a school of reaction (I almost said school of thought!) that is so misleading, so dangerous, so capable of undermining our shared values, that they cannot be allowed to go unopposed.

The bottom line for me is that all views should be open to public analysis and evaluated by the community. Then we can respond with reasonable and rational argument. Ideas without factual or rational foundations will be shown for what they are in the public arena. Better that, than pushing them into the shadows where they can remain unquestioned.

I know that as a Christian, there are those who would deny me the right to talk and write about my beliefs in public. With the wrong approach to the extremists, even religious ideas could be “cancelled”, or any minority position denied the right to question. History has shown that it is the freedom to question in the public arena that allows for positive change. It is the denial of that freedom that is the first act of autocrats and fascists. We have to allow open dialogue.

That is the best approach, except for the fact that some will believe the extreme views, in spite of rational argument against them, and believe the far out conspiracies, because that is what a certain percentage of the population want to believe. There is a feeling of being on the inside, of being smart enough to see the conspiracy that no one else does, that appeals to many. Who killed JFK? Was the Moon landing faked? Is there a secret worldwide organization that really runs everything?

Man, this is not an easy thing to deal with, given how much space the conspiracy believers have to spread their ideas. But I suppose we have to trust one another to know fact from fiction, truth from lies. The problem is that we haven’t shown ourselves to be very good at knowing that. But we can work it out with respect, tolerance, and some rational thought. Too much to hope?


  1. Facts over Fiction and Conspiracy Theorists
    My articles and letters sent to major newspapers across our country and even some in Europe over the past forty years had to be factual, to the point and devoid of opinion based on fiction. During my 25 years at Kemptville College the articles I wrote or letters I sent were always checked by others before release. Even today I have a few people read my articles or letters before I send them to the North Grenville Times. That is to prevent my “Stinking Thinking” taking control my writing and distort the content of any letter or article or article I write.
    The letter of August 11 about Climate Change is a collection of “Stinking Thinking”, such as “Man-made climate Change is a Thesis, not a proven fact”. Why do we have a climate station on the campus? We have that station on campus since the twenties to record climate data. The letter writer continues: ”Remember CO2 is our friend.” Where on earth does she get that fact from? We might as well stop teaching kids the Carbon Cycle, because they will learn facts today from conspiracies. She continues on by writing: “That we get many benefits from increased CO2, the greening of the earth”. We know that plants absorb CO2, but we are wasting it all and allow it to be released into the atmosphere.
    The problem is we don’t conserve that CO2 absorbed by the plants through Carbon Sequestration. Finally, global warming is not replaced by climate change. She forgot to say that global warming and climate change is caused by the “Greenhouse Effect”, because of the rapid accumulation of the CO2 in the atmosphere.
    This letter writer should spend some time out in BC to battle all the wild fires and loss of the “greening of the earth”.
    Finally, I am asking myself: “Why do I write articles for the North Grenville Times?” My factual articles will always be disputed by conspiracy theorists. Therefore, I made a decision not to write articles anymore to a society of conspiracy theorists or nut-jobs and non-believers. I just gave up. I can’t deal with nut-jobs. That is so sad, as I do get call from the older generation, showing their appreciation for the articles I write.

    • It seems to me that you should keep writing your articles. If just one person changes their opinion and realizes fact from fiction, then your articles are successful. That one person will then have the opportunity to influence others with their newfound knowledge. So, don’t give up….then the nut jobs win and that indeed is very sad.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here